Sen. Gillibrand hates young men and proposes to end due process in new CASA bill

Posted in Uncategorized on March 8, 2015 by bricko


I have some issue/questions on the Gillibrand Campus Safety act and it’s still lacking in due process and its allowing Universities to address these criminal acts. 

The new bill still does not delineate the due process allowed by the US Constitution.  The bill says this due process is whatever the University allows….that should not be allowed.  These sexual assaults are criminal acts and need to be handled by proper law enforcement investigations, not some campus kangaroo court by the local social science dept., whom are likely biased to start with.

The DoJ has put out a letter telling universities to not use the “without a doubt” standard in other criminal cases and to now use just the “preponderance of evidence” which is much lower standard in order to get more convictions.  This is not acceptable.

The bill does NOT allow for standard Cross Examination by the accused for god’s sake, not acceptable, so the accused can NOT defend themselves.  And lawyers should be either allowed or required by BOTH parties,  the accused most assuredly must have one to meet constitutional due process.  We MUST get the universities out of the criminal court business.  Right now there are No jury, No attorney, No Witnesses likely….but you get expelled anyway.

As of right now there are 60 cases brought against universities by the male accused…..for lack of due process, and the trial attorneys are pulling together massive class action suits nationwide that will ruin some universities.  For lack of due process and ruining many you male lives.  This is part of the Democrat war on boys.

This article by Ashe Show provides better round up of the issue that is now being debated. She puts it in a better light.  It’s also being discussed by the legal scholars at Harvard etc. and the top professors there have signed on to address this lack of due process.

This has been brought about the erroneous and completely wrong and now debunked (1 in 5 ) statistic of rape on campus.  It is so wrong that even

Sen. Gillibrand has removed that number from her own web site.

I have provided a group of info I have researched an pulled together and attached at bottom of this email.


Please  update your info on the stories of rape being increasing on college campus.  The guys who put out the 1 in 5 stat say it’s not right and not indicative of national numbers.  It was a self-directed study and not valid since it was only from 2 colleges and not randomized.

Even Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand removes debunked 1 in 5 sexual assault statistic from website

Let’s think a bit.  OU has around 25,000 students.  If 1 in 5 women are raped, which would mean 20% of about 13,000 (women are little over ½ od student body) would be 2600 rapes over a 9 month school year. That would be about 300 per month….my god that is 10 rapes every day at OU…..ludicrous on its face.  Stop spreading such silliness.

According to the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, the rate of rape and sexual assault is lower for college students (at 6.1 per 1,000) than for non-students (7.6 per 1,000). (Note: not 1 in 5). What’s more, between 1997 and 2013, rape against women dropped by about 50%, in keeping with a more general drop in violent crime nationally.

DoJ changes rules on how to address investigations…..males not allowed to defend themselves. Rules of evidence changed

Plus the definition of rape and or sexual assault has been drastically redefined to cover “touching outside of clothing: so apparently you have been sexually assaulted if you ride on an elevator and someone touches you.

There is a reason for this….it’s the feminist authorities that infest academia and their war on males. And the DoJ changing definitions of punishment and forcing males to NOT defending themselves in kangaroo courts devised by the colleges who have no business in judging what should be criminal cases that need investigated by police, not academics.  The males are not even allowed to have legal representatives.

No Trial? No Jury? No Witnesses? No Attorney? Student Expelled Anyway


Reference material debunking the epidemic of rape nonsense. 

Rolling Stone and the myth of a rape epidemic

Harvard Liberals Hate New Campus Sex Laws

28 Harvard liberal law professors write letter condemning “rape epidemic” and lack of due process for the accused. 

If you have lost the leftist lawyers at Harvard….your cause is doomed.

The truth – that rape on campus is becoming less common – doesn’t fit the left’s narrative.

Univ. of Tennessee professor – “Americans have been living through an enormously sensationalized college rape hoax, but as the evidence accumulates it’s becoming clear that the entire thing was just a bunch of media hype and political opportunism.”

No, 1 in 5 women have not been raped on college campuses

Massive law suits are being planned by males against universities and are already winning millions.  Major universities are going to be on the hook for multi millions when the lawsuits get pulled together into class actions.

Male student sues university, accuses gender bias in rape case

No Trial? No Jury? No Witnesses? No Attorney? Student Expelled Anyway

Nigerian-born German Dr Daniel Ubani is Labeled ANIMAL.

Posted in Uncategorized on November 7, 2014 by bricko

Seems incompetent Dr. is labeled Animal by family of man he killed, then sued family for calling him names.   Only in England and EU can such happen.

Nancy Pelosi to continue to support Genocide.

Posted in Uncategorized on August 13, 2014 by bricko

Nancy Pelosi to continue to support Genocide.

No military on ground.

Stories Slashdot will Censor

Posted in Uncategorized on August 1, 2014 by bricko

Record low temps outpacing record highs 2-1 in USA…

Lake Superior 20 degrees colder than in ’12…

Montgomery, AL shatters record low set in 1889…

Coldest July ever in Indianapolis…

Immigration Policies needed for the American People to supoport

Posted in Uncategorized on July 31, 2014 by bricko

On Immigration ‘Reform’ – Requirements we will need to support

Some thoughts on immigration policies put together that must be stated up front about the problems in immigration – people who call for “comprehensive immigration reform” seldom mean it. That goes for both the open borders Left and the Crony Capitalist Chamber of Commerce and cheap labor business cohort.

The last thing a proponent of immigration reform wants is – immigration reform. Remember that paradox, and the insanity at the border makes some sense.

Each day a worried politician or pundit lectures us about the need for “comprehensive immigration reform” to avoid the sort of chaos we are witnessing on the border.

Then a funny thing happens. The speaker never defines the term. If on rare occasions advocates are asked, they fumble around, annoyed that anyone would press them to explain what they mean.

In truth, no one in the open-borders/crony coalition wants anything approaching comprehensive immigration reform. Advocates are embarrassed about the present mess at the border not because thousands of foreign nationals, many of them unescorted children and teens, from Latin America, without skills or education, are flocking illegally across the border after largely taking the amnesty cue from Barack Obama, but because they are doing so in such dramatic fashion that the influx has awakened the sleeping

Giant that is the American people and exposed illegal immigration to be a callous enterprise, promoted by a coalition of self-interested political operatives, commercial concerns, and ethnic con artists.

So, if reform could be done, what should be included in this immigration reform?

Such legislation would first have to make border security the top priority. And that would entail several unpalatable requisites.

Prefaced that:

All temporary workers will be recruited and hired through agencies IN THE ORIGINATING COUNTRY.  Allowed to be in the US for no more than 6 months, then must return home through entry, exit system of verifications. ALL  temp workers will remain “…under the jurisdiction….” of their originating country due to the 14th amendment.  No birthright citizenship will be allowed as they are to remain under the jurisdiction of originating country as guests and visitors to the US. Employers will provide/pay transport to and from their work site to originating country.

1. The first step would be the completion of the fence. Fences do work. That is why, for example, former mayor of Los Angeles and open-borders advocate Antonio Villaraigosa (“We don’t need to build walls, we need to build bridges”) became the first mayor in Los Angeles history to insist on a six-foot-high security fence around his official mayoral residence in Windsor Square, or why the White House, the homes of Silicon Valley billionaires, and the vacation homes of the elite on Martha’s Vineyard all have security fences. How odd that we are lectured about the Neanderthal nature of secure borders by elites who are about the only ones in America who demand them around their own estates. Perhaps ask Mr. Zuckerberg of Facebook about this. He has purchased all the surrounding homes around his….so others may not encroach on him.

2. Second, the Border Patrol would have to turn back all who crossed illegally and then let that be known. Border “Patrolling” is not what they are currently doing. A more accurate term for the present agency would be “Border Ushers” who simply direct these illegals to their appointed seats at OUR table.

3. Third, until deterrence is established, more guards would have to patrol the entire border area. And the more the border was made sacrosanct, the more underworked operatives in the interior could be redeployed to the border.

4. Massive INTERIOR Enforcement will be required via E-Verify and or national ID that is Verifiable. The E-Verify system should be adjusted to not just be used for employment verification, but also for any contract, home purchase, and auto purchase, or other as seen needed by individual states. The border will likely never be closed and interior enforcement will have to be made strong at the business level.

5. Employer/businesses must be held accountable for hiring illegals. First offence – 10,000 fines per employee, Second offense – 100,000 per employee and Third offence will automatically result in seizure of entire business and all assets sold off and shut down, then criminal charges brought against owner/CEO/Board of Directors. This is to get the attention of Chamber of Commerce and other low wage cronies.

6. Due to possibilities of Presidential Executive Orders undermining future enforcements, these enforcements must be tied together to any “goodies” in any bill. Example being if any enforcement is E.O.’d out….then H1b visa’s will be cut in half automatically etc. One must automatically be tied to the other.

7. Entry-Exit Visa tracking and enforcement

8. Allow States to act on enforcement and experiment with various options according to THEIR own needs/wants.

9. Tax on remittances to Mexico/other countries to lessen their participation in pushing their poor illiterate citizens to migrate. Stop the monies-stop the push.

10. Move to Needs based and cease familial and random lottery visa based immigration. Only immediate family can be attached. No extended families. Otherwise you have a never ending inflow. Need based is priority.

11. A very hard and serious discussion needs to be had on Birthright Citizenship. Illegal entry to the US should not infer them being “…subject to the jurisdiction of…” of the 14th amendment and not therefore be automatic citizens. Most other countries have done away with this in their countries due to the high level of movement available with today’s travel technologies. Stop birthright tourism industry.

12. Another hard discussion needs to be had on – is there a real need for ANY immigration? The so called shortage of STEM workers is and has always been bogus. There are 5 million STEM workers either out of work or working in areas not in their STEM fields. We needed immigration 80 years ago to fill out manual labor and farm needs….that is no longer the case and has not been for some time. We have 98 million folks OUT of the labor pool. Every study has found no need for Tech worker immigration. The only reason found has been – LOWER WAGES. And that is not a valid reason. Some of the most fabled names in the tech business (Apple, Facebook etc.) have conspired to fix the wages of their highly qualified engineers by forming illegal non-competitive hiring pacts, so it’s hard to tell just how pressing the demand for engineering talent really is.

13. Do not fall for the oft heard phrase “we are nation founded by immigrants”. That is not true. When the Europeans came here, there was NO Country in existence to “immigrate” to. And those who came here were Explorers and Conquerors. Not immigrants.

If enforcement is not mandatory this will all have to be done again….as it has every time before. Non enforcement has been followed up after legalization or amnesties.

Merit based immigration — is equally an anathema to those who call for it in the abstract. If legal immigration were to be ethnically blind, and based on merit rather than proximity to the southern border, the ethnic con artist industry would rise in revolt.

Racist groups such as La Raza affiliates do not believe in true diversity, racial or otherwise. They do not want legal immigration to be based on skills or college degrees, which might result in a million Kenyan doctors, Czech engineers, Chilean nurses, Mexican architects, Punjabi programmers, or Korean dentists entering the United States.

Think of all the ramifications of ethnically blind criteria that would drive liberals crazy. The ethnic con artists might see the end of huge influxes of poor and uneducated Central Americans and Mexicans. Without such a large and continually replenished pool, assimilation, integration, and intermarriage — the now-hated melting pot — would occur and make “Latinos” in a generation or two the equivalent of Italian Americans.

In other words, ethnic heritage would be incidental, not essential to one’s American identity, a fact that would mean to the Latino elite an eventual end to affirmative action, Chicano Studies, and the bilingual industry.

There are no Italian-language mega media conglomerates, no La Razza type pressure groups, and no affirmative action for those surnamed Giuliani or Cuomo. Seeing people as individuals is exactly what the Chicano grievance industry does not wish. Yet the end of grievance politics is what would occur if we did not have a million Latinos crossing illegally each year into the U.S. but rather a manageable number, legally and in accordance with the ethnically blind criteria applied to any other immigrants.

Nor would the liberal or the chamber of commerce elite in general like such merit-based immigration. They are happy to have cheap unskilled labor for janitorial work, landscaping, nannying, field labor, and construction, with such a pool driving down the wages of others. But skilled professionals in law, medicine, business, and other professions would compete with the native elite. Paying a high wage for an American citizen to do housework while competing for a job with a foreign-born stockbroker, professor, reporter, or lawyer may not be what proponents of comprehensive immigration reform had in mind.

A legislative compromise always seems within reach. There is a vast DC lobbying/media complex that depends for its survival on “comprehensive” reform always seeming within reach — to keep the corporate clients paying the bills, to keep the grant makers granting, to keep reporters on their beats writing easy denunciations of DC dysfunction, to keep the whole capital consensus from unnecessary introspection (in which Republicans might have to rethink parts of their platform other than the immigration plank, while Democrats might have to consider what low-skilled migration, expanded in the service of cheap ethnic politics, is doing to their former working class base).

Many Americans would support giving aliens who came here years ago, who have always been working and paying taxes, and who have been crime-free a chance at a green card. With mastery of English, the payment of a penalty for their illegal residence, and certification of self-support, many would be eligible for a pathway to citizenship. However, the open-borders alliance wishes no deportation of anyone. Business leaders who might support deportation do not wish to be called racists. Ethnic activists do not wish to lose any constituents, especially those currently deeply dependent on government social services. And liberal politicians want poor illiterates as future constituents regardless of their particular circumstances.

The next time a politician drones on about “comprehensive immigration reform,” a few questions have to be asked: How is the border made secure first? Is it desirable that legal immigration be merit based and ethnically diverse? And does anyone get deported, and if so who exactly?

Silence will follow — or, if not silence, a long string of invective nonsense. It’s no longer possible to say our grandparents made it, despite their apparent disadvantages.

They were different people, and that was a different country and different time.

Nor can one rely on “education” or “assimilation” — what if the immigrants simply conclude that their views are just better than the domestic majority’s? I think many of the current residents may rightly say “We have nothing against immigrants; but we don’t want our rights changed by the arrival of people who have a different perspective on the world than we do.”

Letting in immigrants means letting in your future rulers.

If today’s immigrant wave were likely to vote Republican, all right-thinking people would be demanding deportations and a mile-wide belt of barbed wire and minefields along the border. But they won’t be voting Republican so they will be let in.

The UK has just caught on to immigration frailties….and announced:

David Cameron announces immigration crackdown

Benefits for EU migrants will be cut off after three months, says PM, as he promises Coalition changes will ‘put Britain first’

Question–Is it an Invasion?

Posted in Uncategorized on July 29, 2014 by bricko

Are we being invaded by massive unfettered illegal immigration.

If your country is being invaded some hard questions need be asked:

1. Should they be killed?

Google Celebrates the 20th Century’s Greatest Female Mass Murderer, Rachel Carson

Posted in Uncategorized on May 27, 2014 by bricko

Go on to Google today and you’ll see a charming illustration celebrating the life and work of environmentalist Rachel Carson. There’s a turtle and a pelican and a crab and a delightful seal in an idyllic landscape of flowers and trees and water. But what are missing from the picture, for some bizarre reason, are the dead bodies of the millions of people who died of malaria thanks to Carson’s principled campaigning against the insecticide DDT.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.